Tiger Lily v2 96% MEMBERS (1g)

Description

Where to begin with this absolute animal of an extract. The original Tiger Lily extract is an impossible standard to live up to. It holds an almost mythical status in our community for the astounding results it gave so consistently and reliably. We thought another truly comparable extract to give the moniker “v2″ would never come. We were wrong. The moment you see it, you know it is special. A glistening finely ground orange crystalline powder. There is a difference though… It’s stronger than the original. MUCH stronger. As one tester eloquently says ” i wouldnt say its as ‘sleek’ as tiger lily. It has a lot more backhand to it. Where tigerlily hit just the right spots, this one hits every spot and leaves them crying.” A notable quality of this extract amongst the test groups was the prominence of euphoria, while also giving massive relief. It doesn’t compromise in any area of the 7-OH experience.  I hesitate to say this, but… Tiger Lily v2 is perfect. The labs vary, but we did notice it is best calculated at 85-90%. Was incredibly strong when using the normal 80% calculations.

Sold in quantities of 1g

WARNING: You NEED to have a calibrated milligram scale and calculate proper doses. We will provide a calculator to aid with this. Some experimentation will be required for your individual chemistry, so start small! It may be habit and/or dependence forming. When used irresponsibly it may cause your tolerance to kratom alkaloids to increase, making kratom powder or other extracts less effective at your previously “normal” doses. If you have an addictive personality or current/previous abuse issues with substances it may be best to steer clear of something this powerful.

Manufacturer Lab: 85.71% 7-OH / 2.23% MIT

SDPharm: 96.87% 7-OH / 0.70% MIT –> This was re-tested and confirmed not a fluke

Murray: 74.1% 7-OH / 1.52% MIT –> This is the highest result from Murray thus far. However; despite taking abundant precautions they said the sample arrived at 102 degrees farenheit, so we are suspicious the results are not quite as strong as they should be.

Murray: 74.6% –> We tested it TWICE with Murray because the first sample UPS messed up and the sample was 105 degrees upon arrival to the lab, they both came out virtually identical.